Mathematical Representation Ability Based on Honey Mumfrod Theory in SMP Tahfidh Al-Hidayah Kauman and SMP Jawaahirul Hikmah Besuki Tulungagung Students

Putri Ayu Lia Shofiana; Umy Zahroh; Sutopo Sutopo

doi:10.51773/ajeb.v4i2.425

Authors

Putri Ayu Lia Shofiana Universitas Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung, Indonesia
Umy Zahroh UIN Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung, Indonesia
Sutopo UIN Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51773/ajeb.v4i2.425

Keywords:

Mathematical Representation Ability, Learning Type, Honey Mumford Theory

Abstract

Representation is a form of interpretation of student thinking about a problem that is used as a tool in finding solutions to given problems. Representation is useful to help students in solving a math problem that looks difficult to be easier. The purpose of this study is to describe mathematical representation ability based on Honey Mumford's theory of activist, reflective, theoretical, and pragmatic types. This research uses a qualitative approach with a case study research type. The data collection techniques used in this research are questionnaires, tests, and interviews. Data analysis was carried out through data reduction, data presentation, and verification stages. Data validity checking using triagulation technique. The result of this study is the mathematical representation ability of students in honey mumford theory activist type that students are able to represent well visual representation, symbolic representation and verbal representation. The reflective type is that students are able to represent well with visual representation, symbolic representation and verbal representation. The theoretical type of students is able to represent well verbal representation, while for visual and symbolic representation abilities in the sufficient category. The pragmatic type is that students are able to represent symbolic representations and verbal representations well, while for visual representation skills in the sufficient category.

References

Aini, P. N., Hariyani, S., & Suwanti, V. (2020). Analisis Pemahaman Konsep Matematika Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar Siswa Menurut Teori Honey Mumfor. JP2M (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Matematika), 6(2), 44-52.

Chotimah, S., Sari, I. P., & Zanthy, L. S. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematik Siswa SMP Pada Materi Kubus Dan Balok. Jurnal Ilmiah P2M STKIP Siliwangi, 6(2), 86-89.

Dewey, J. (1986, September). Experience and education. In The educational forum (Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 241-252). Taylor & Francis Group.

English, L. D., & Halford, G. S. (2012). Mathematics education: Models and processes. Routledge.

Hendarti, T., Yunarti, T., & Asnawati, R. (2015). Perbandingan Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Antara Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe TPS dan TTW. JURNAL PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA UNIVERSITAS LAMPUNG, 3(1).

Idris, S. (2017). Learning by Conscience as a New Paradigm in Education. Research Article, 23(2), 853-856.

Jagom, Y. O. (2015). Kreativitas siswa SMP dalam menyelesaikan masalah geometri berdasarkan gaya belajar visual-spatial dan auditory-sequential. Math Didactic: jurnal pendidikan matematika, 1(3).

Jansen, B. R., Schmitz, E. A., & Van der Maas, H. L. (2016). Affective and motivational factors mediate the relation between math skills and use of math in everyday life. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 513.

Kasper, G. (2001). Four perspectives on L2 pragmatic development. Applied linguistics, 22(4), 502-530.

La'ia, H. T., & Harefa, D. (2021). Hubungan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis dengan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematik Siswa. Aksara: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Nonformal, 7(2), 463-474.

Rahmah, K., Inganah, S., Darmayanti, R., Sugianto, R., & Ningsih, E. F. (2022). Analysis of Mathematics Problem Solving Ability of Junior High School Students Based on APOS Theory Viewed from the Type of Kolb Learning Style. INdoMATH: Indonesia Mathematics Education, 5(2), 109-122.

Rahmawati, J. V. (2021). Upaya Meningkatkan Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa dengan Metode Pembelajaran Guided Note Taking Berbantuan GeoGebra. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika Jakarta, 3(1), 27-35.

Rahmy, S. N., Usodo, B., & Slamet, I. (2019, March). Mathematics communication skill of student in junior high school based on students thinking style. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1188, No. 1, p. 012107). IOP Publishing.

Sari, D. S., Kusnandi, K., & Suhendra, S. (2017, September). A cognitive analysis of students’ mathematical communication ability on geometry. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 895, No. 1, p. 012083). IOP Publishing.

Sekaryanti, R., Darmayanti, R., Choirudin, C., Usmiyatun, U., Kestoro, E., & Bausir, U. (2022). Analysis of Mathematics Problem-Solving Ability of Junior High School Students in Emotional Intelligence. Jurnal Gantang, 7(2), 149-161.

Zakirman, Z. (2017). Kelompok gaya belajar reflektor menurut teori Honey Mumford dalam paradigma perpustakaan. Shaut Al-Maktabah: Jurnal Perpustakaan, Arsip Dan Dokumentasi, 9(2), 133-142.